Freedom, determinism and moral responsibility i human nature and human freedom ii determinism you do not believe that the action was without cause the progress of science, the great advances in explaining and predicting events in both the natural and the social sciences which heretofore seemed deeply mysterious is offered as evidence. I believe in freedom of legal speech/press/assembly once people cross that line, i believe they should be arrested once they go too far and start violence, destruction, criminal acts then i think the system has a duty to stop them, even to the point of shooting them if the situation calls for it. Question: do you believe women have the right to freedom of speech answer: i believe all people should have the right to freedom of speech however, i am curious as to why feminists charles moffat and suzanne macnevin should frame the question in a way to make it gender specific.
So you’re against the nanny state – do you believe in freedom t his is a simple question, and there is no ‘wrong’ answer the purpose is to help us find any inconsistency in our beliefs the question is: do you believe in freedom. If you're asking whether i believe that everyone has the right to express their religious beliefs without fear of ridicule, no i do not if everyone has a right to hold a religious belief, then everyone else has a right to tell them they're full of it. Enacted in 1966, the freedom of information act (foia) is a federal law that establishes the public's right to obtain information from federal government agencies department of defense, 880 f2d 1381 explain why you believe the agency has material responsive to your request and inquire about other places in the agency's files where.
As soon as you make yourself the arbiter of what is and is not allowed to be said, you no longer support freedom of speech (not freedom in general, for that matter) i never said that people should not be allowed to spout hate speech i merely say that it shouldn't be classed under free speech. And i think you know what i mean by certain groups personally, i feel that some idiots mistake freedom of speech as being able to say what ever you want but, freedom of speech, just like freedom of expression, stops where another persons freedom starts. No, as i believe in it far too often misunderstood, as freedom from speech, and morons eventually fuck it up because without the wisdom to know why just because you can do something, good reason exist to not. I believe in freedom of speech, as long as it doesn't hurt anyone and it doesn't involve where pehaps you may find yourself getting hurt or killed or even landing up in a jail cell however, having the right to speak out and even act on something you believe in, is something i do admire and respect.
What you may not do, is to cast them off as idiots you may not resent them for honestly disagreeing if they believe in john locke’s liberty, they are your allies, not your enemies if they believe in john locke’s liberty, they are your allies, not your enemies. “if you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games and virtual pornography, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. Well, if you truly believe that you have freedom of speech in the usa then you are wearing self imposed blinkers try saying what so many americans want to about the people they have in the white house and see how long you remain a free man.
Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or sanction the term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously but includes any act of seeking, receiving, and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. Since you’ve been waiting patiently milton friedman, the great nobel prize winning economist wrote a book called ‘capitalism and freedom’ where he posited that for a free society to exist, there must be a high degree of economic freedom. Yes, i believe in freedom of religion, at least until it gets to a point where religion begins to control everything but that's another issue altogether as for the situation you described, well, there are many things that could be behind your not being included in the conversation.
Freedom of association freedom to assembly freedom from want freedom to have a choice out of at least a dozen political,parties freedom to express an opinion havw your pick. Yes, to a degree without freedom we aren't able to express our self and really learn who we are or make our own decisions freedom to think for our self without others forcing your decision. I still believe in ideals i am not for a return to that definition of liberty under which for many years a free people were being gradually regimented into the service of the privileged few i prefer and i am sure you prefer that broader definition of liberty under which we are moving forward to greater freedom, to greater security for the.